HOW TO LAND ON THE MOON - Smarter Every Day 250

30.01.2021
1 253 630 Näkymät

Get 1st Audiobook + full access to the Plus Catalog for free when you try Audible for 30 days www.audible.com/smarter or TXT smarter to 500500
Click here if you're interested in subscribing: bit.ly/Subscribe2SED
⇊ Click below for more links! ⇊
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
GET SMARTER SECTION
A very special thank you to Wayne Ottinger
www.aletro.org/
Check out the AMAZING website by Ben Feist that synchronizes all Apollo data:
www.apolloinrealtime.org/
I had to find a lot of archival footage to make this video. Thanks to Devin for helping me find the original Apollo LLTV footage from Ellington.
A special thank you to twitter.com/steveslater1987 for providing the footage and audio of the Neil Armstrong Interview after flying the LLTV.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tweet Ideas to me at:
twitter.com/smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day on Facebook
facebook.com/SmarterEveryDay
Smarter Every Day on Patreon
www.patreon.com/smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day On Instagram
instagram.com/smartereveryday
Smarter Every Day SubReddit
www.reddit.com/r/smartereveryday
Ambiance, audio and musicy things by: Gordon McGladdery
www.ashellinthepit.com/
ashellinthepit.bandcamp.com/
If you feel like this video was worth your time and added value to your life, please SHARE THE VIDEO!
If you REALLY liked it, feel free to pitch a few dollars Smarter Every Day by becoming a Patron.
www.patreon.com/smartereveryday
Warm Regards,
Destin

Kommentteja
  • We're going back to the moon, and we're going to need to train Astronauts how to land. This video is the result of trying to understand that control problem better. in the next video of this series, I'll show you footage from an actual NASA Lunar Lander software test I participated in many years ago. Also, I'd like to say express grateful I am to everyone who supports Smarter Every Day on Patreon at www.patreon.com/smartereveryday . If you've never considered being a Patreon of Smarter Every Day, then feel free to click the link if you'd like to see what it's all about. If not, then no big deal! I'm grateful that you're here. Warm Regards, Destin

    SmarterEveryDaySmarterEveryDay26 päivää sitten
    • @MaGaO true, but the software to land reliably is fairly new and getting better all the time. Most of the failed Mars landings happened without the benefit of the sensors and algorithms available now. It's still best to train the pilots of course.

      AlmaadinAlmaadin13 tuntia sitten
    • @Almaadin Many Mars probes have crashed. If humans are aboard, it makes sense to train them just in case.

      MaGaOMaGaOPäivä sitten
    • @Almaadin that was done on earth..so gullible lol. Mars supposedly is 1% density of earth atmosphere. which means no air. an you need air to slow parachute and need air for lift when they eventually fly helicopter drone. so the impossible without air debunks your Mars landing 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😭😭

      hernan jimenezhernan jimenezPäivä sitten
    • I disagree with your thesis statement. After watching perseverance land itself, I think we could definitely automate landing on the moon. It is probably still a good idea to train astronauts to land on the moon but I don't think we HAVE to.

      AlmaadinAlmaadinPäivä sitten
    • Where is the helicopter video? No links?

      That ScarThat Scar2 päivää sitten
  • Why do we need manual landing when we sent multiple rovers to mars and it has ability to auto land with high precision

    Suphakrit PhantharatSuphakrit Phantharat3 tuntia sitten
  • 15:55 oh my ghaad

    Bogdan BogdanBogdan Bogdan4 tuntia sitten
  • 1:45 kinda sus....

    Bread SpreaderBread Spreader5 tuntia sitten
  • They actually planned on hitting the moon harder, the crunch pistons on the legs didn't get crunched all the way, that's why their steps are more awkward than usual, edit, because the ladder was hooked on the leg

    PatarPatar5 tuntia sitten
  • Hahaha cant wait til you debunk it by looking into it :)

    Rooster OriginalRooster Original6 tuntia sitten
  • How? miniatures and a sound stage...

    britshellbritshell6 tuntia sitten
  • That was fascinating! Very few people are qualified to call Neil Armstrong an idiot! lol

    mikencomikenco7 tuntia sitten
  • I think what you're saying, that we need to learn about *why* decisions were made, is really the root of the "teach a man to fish" adage, and it's such a huge issue with the way I see things being taught. Don't give people the answer, give people the tools to find the answer.

    The InternetThe Internet8 tuntia sitten
  • Folks at NASA are probably taking notes rn.

    Phineas GPhineas G8 tuntia sitten
  • Why does the velocity have to be zero upon landing? Why not near zero?

    Black PantherBlack Panther9 tuntia sitten
  • You're making it too easy for tomorrow's kids, they will look like geniuses but instead it was all on youtube.

    LavalambtronLavalambtron9 tuntia sitten
  • never went to the moon brah. hash tag moon landing hoax

    Laura WhiteLaura White13 tuntia sitten
    • @Laura White I have better things to do than watch conspiracy videos. That said, I never came across a good hoaxer argument.

      AtlasAtlas12 tuntia sitten
    • Atlas gee what a convincing retort Atlas. See “American Moon” on YT and then try to tell me it’s not possible that something’s up with the official narrative.

      Laura WhiteLaura White12 tuntia sitten
    • wrong

      AtlasAtlas12 tuntia sitten
  • You are truly a treasure! I so appreciate all of your videos, they are some of the most wholesome and informative media out there.

    David MadsenDavid Madsen14 tuntia sitten
  • 1:58

    Ian ThorntonIan Thornton17 tuntia sitten
  • 1:58 amongus

    AsophosAsophos21 tunti sitten
  • 1:44 I can't take this anymore make the pain stop

    WyrylkaWyrylka21 tunti sitten
  • 1:45

    Aidan GavinAidan GavinPäivä sitten
  • Thanks for the tutorial, just got invited to a Martian party. Heading out tomorrow night.

    Konnies EggKonnies EggPäivä sitten
  • Another great video. It would be interesting to know more about the rocket motor that was on the lander and got it back to the orbiter. I had read something where the NASA engineers made it as simple as possible; without any electrical connections to reduce points of failure. It was basically just a mixing of two (2) chemicals by means of the turning of two (2) mechanical valves. Thanks in advance.

    goutvols103goutvols103Päivä sitten
  • I flew a test device in Grumman hangar 5 over a mosaic set of lunar photos. All I had was a mockup of the LM cockpit. I made 3 test landing attempts for evaluation data. 50 years later I toured the hangar at the Cape Canaveral facility and in an alcove next to the Saturn V rocket was the same unit I tested at the Grumman facility. I worked at Grumman for 30+ years on the A-6 Intruder , the F-14 Tomcat,and The JSTARS . Fun years!

    Carl CarterCarl CarterPäivä sitten
  • There's only three ways to go to the Moon, or one. Step one, resurrect Stanley Kubrick. Step two, rent al large studio in the desert. Step three, buy all media and political influencers to give it credibility. Or Get a bunch of wicked smaht guys to get'em there.

    The Obsolete ManThe Obsolete ManPäivä sitten
  • U said among us a lot

    Traci WagnonTraci WagnonPäivä sitten
  • Excellent. Great job. I know a lot more about lunar landing than I did before watching this. Sign me up!

    lungoteverelungoteverePäivä sitten
  • 1:59 among us

    Tampa BlushTampa BlushPäivä sitten
  • 1:45 amongus

    Tampa BlushTampa BlushPäivä sitten
  • 1:45

    Jeremy HopkinsJeremy HopkinsPäivä sitten
  • Boots on the moon.

    Bradyn AustinBradyn AustinPäivä sitten
  • 1:45 , 1:59

    JPazerJPazerPäivä sitten
  • 1:45

    JPazerJPazerPäivä sitten
  • Hey, I know this video is about the moon, but I have had this question on my mind for a while now, and the recent Mars landing has brought it back again (and I can't think of anyone else to ask) so here goes... This is regarding the 7 minutes of terror: Do you think that it is possible for NASA to build signal amplifiers that would be strategically placed between Mars and Earth, and these would boost the signal enough to reduce the delay in communication time? Or is this still too far in the future? I'm thinking 2 or 3 satellites spaced evenly across the distance whose purpose is to catch and slingshot the signals back and forth... Thank you for your response (provided you get this message, or for anyone else who may have a theory/answer).

    Derrick FyffeDerrick FyffePäivä sitten
    • The delay is because of the finite speed of light. There's nothing that can be done about that.

      AtlasAtlas19 tuntia sitten
  • Don't you think the next lander will have highly AI assisted landing if not completely AI assisted landing? Although I agree that manual intervention from the onboard astronauts might be necessary and hence the training on earth is necessary.

    Chinmoy KatharChinmoy KatharPäivä sitten
  • I WANNA SEE THIS CARTOON! MAKE IT HAPEN!

    Travis WeideTravis WeidePäivä sitten
  • What a brilliant video. Thank you.

    Peter HoarePeter HoarePäivä sitten
  • I couldnt find video of the crane attached llrv anywhere else. Where did you get the LLRF-LLRV footage, if you can/want to answer?

    Sadrho GollsodiaSadrho GollsodiaPäivä sitten
  • Never heard of the X14 either - wow.

    Mac KettnerMac KettnerPäivä sitten
  • Thank you for that video that was awesome I am a space not even though I am not able to go into space but that is so cool that we had that and I bet if we go back to the moon like they want us to we need that version of or a new version of training aid

    curtuswcurtuswPäivä sitten
  • Thanks, dude.

    JustJoe OlesonJustJoe OlesonPäivä sitten
  • 1:44 ⠀⠀⠀⡯⡯⡾⠝⠘⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢊⠘⡮⣣⠪⠢⡑⡌ ⠀⠀⠀⠟⠝⠈⠀⠀⠀⠡⠀⠠⢈⠠⢐⢠⢂⢔⣐⢄⡂⢔⠀⡁⢉⠸⢨⢑⠕⡌ ⠀⠀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠀⡀⢂⠡⠈⡔⣕⢮⣳⢯⣿⣻⣟⣯⣯⢷⣫⣆⡂⠀⠀⢐⠑⡌ ⢀⠠⠐⠈⠀⢀⢂⠢⡂⠕⡁⣝⢮⣳⢽⡽⣾⣻⣿⣯⡯⣟⣞⢾⢜⢆⠀⡀⠀⠪ ⣬⠂⠀⠀⢀⢂⢪⠨⢂⠥⣺⡪⣗⢗⣽⢽⡯⣿⣽⣷⢿⡽⡾⡽⣝⢎⠀⠀⠀⢡ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⢂⠢⢂⢥⢱⡹⣪⢞⡵⣻⡪⡯⡯⣟⡾⣿⣻⡽⣯⡻⣪⠧⠑⠀⠁⢐ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⠢⢑⠠⠑⠕⡝⡎⡗⡝⡎⣞⢽⡹⣕⢯⢻⠹⡹⢚⠝⡷⡽⡨⠀⠀⢔ ⣿⡯⠀⢈⠈⢄⠂⠂⠐⠀⠌⠠⢑⠱⡱⡱⡑⢔⠁⠀⡀⠐⠐⠐⡡⡹⣪⠀⠀⢘ ⣿⣽⠀⡀⡊⠀⠐⠨⠈⡁⠂⢈⠠⡱⡽⣷⡑⠁⠠⠑⠀⢉⢇⣤⢘⣪⢽⠀⢌⢎ ⣿⢾⠀⢌⠌⠀⡁⠢⠂⠐⡀⠀⢀⢳⢽⣽⡺⣨⢄⣑⢉⢃⢭⡲⣕⡭⣹⠠⢐⢗ ⣿⡗⠀⠢⠡⡱⡸⣔⢵⢱⢸⠈⠀⡪⣳⣳⢹⢜⡵⣱⢱⡱⣳⡹⣵⣻⢔⢅⢬⡷ ⣷⡇⡂⠡⡑⢕⢕⠕⡑⠡⢂⢊⢐⢕⡝⡮⡧⡳⣝⢴⡐⣁⠃⡫⡒⣕⢏⡮⣷⡟ ⣷⣻⣅⠑⢌⠢⠁⢐⠠⠑⡐⠐⠌⡪⠮⡫⠪⡪⡪⣺⢸⠰⠡⠠⠐⢱⠨⡪⡪⡰ ⣯⢷⣟⣇⡂⡂⡌⡀⠀⠁⡂⠅⠂⠀⡑⡄⢇⠇⢝⡨⡠⡁⢐⠠⢀⢪⡐⡜⡪⡊ ⣿⢽⡾⢹⡄⠕⡅⢇⠂⠑⣴⡬⣬⣬⣆⢮⣦⣷⣵⣷⡗⢃⢮⠱⡸⢰⢱⢸⢨⢌ ⣯⢯⣟⠸⣳⡅⠜⠔⡌⡐⠈⠻⠟⣿⢿⣿⣿⠿⡻⣃⠢⣱⡳⡱⡩⢢⠣⡃⠢⠁ ⡯⣟⣞⡇⡿⣽⡪⡘⡰⠨⢐⢀⠢⢢⢄⢤⣰⠼⡾⢕⢕⡵⣝⠎⢌⢪⠪⡘⡌⠀ ⡯⣳⠯⠚⢊⠡⡂⢂⠨⠊⠔⡑⠬⡸⣘⢬⢪⣪⡺⡼⣕⢯⢞⢕⢝⠎⢻⢼⣀⠀ ⠁⡂⠔⡁⡢⠣⢀⠢⠀⠅⠱⡐⡱⡘⡔⡕⡕⣲⡹⣎⡮⡏⡑⢜⢼⡱⢩⣗⣯⣟ ⢀⢂⢑⠀⡂⡃⠅⠊⢄⢑⠠⠑⢕⢕⢝⢮⢺⢕⢟⢮⢊⢢⢱⢄⠃⣇⣞⢞⣞⢾ ⢀⠢⡑⡀⢂⢊⠠⠁⡂⡐⠀⠅⡈⠪⠪⠪⠣⠫⠑⡁⢔⠕⣜⣜⢦⡰⡎⡯⡾⡽

    D. SkučasD. SkučasPäivä sitten
    • spooky

      AtlasAtlasPäivä sitten
  • Moon landings were faked, hate to break the news.

    Dick RigglesDick RigglesPäivä sitten
    • Ha! You’re an ignorant moron. You know NOTHING about the engineering involved.

      Brad WooldidgeBrad WooldidgePäivä sitten
    • Hate to break it to you but you are an idiot.

      Kyle LaurentKyle LaurentPäivä sitten
    • @Atlas Seriously, do some thinking and use logic...

      Dick RigglesDick RigglesPäivä sitten
    • Wrong.

      AtlasAtlasPäivä sitten
  • Man I'm excited for this series!

    Bastian NyströmBastian Nyström2 päivää sitten
  • tgagyg

    W BixW Bix2 päivää sitten
  • This was such an amazing technical feat that mankind accomplished. Thank you for taking the time for making this video and doing in depth research, analysis, and interviews with folks that were involved in the space program. Side note: Sad to see almost 1k flat earthers have shown up.

    Nate ShanksNate Shanks2 päivää sitten
  • I love getting smarter everyday with your videos

    Patrick RudolphPatrick Rudolph2 päivää sitten
  • 1:58

    DeltaBravoDeltaBravo2 päivää sitten
  • WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON .. OR SPACE AT ALL. GOD IS REAL AND THE EARTH IS FLAT.

    TP ProductionsTP Productions2 päivää sitten
    • Troll.

      Brad WooldidgeBrad WooldidgePäivä sitten
    • fool spotted

      SkippySkippyPäivä sitten
    • ****IDIOT ALERT****

      Kyle LaurentKyle LaurentPäivä sitten
  • Absolutely amazing! Keep it up

    langwaydpfullangwaydpful2 päivää sitten
  • 13:40 *the highest resolution on a film from the 60s ever?* what i mean is that the picture is sharp enough to compare to 480dp

    torrace12torrace122 päivää sitten
  • It's disappointing I can't like this video more than once.

    Zach AttackZach Attack2 päivää sitten
  • I read Mr. Collins abridged version of his book in Reader's Digest, in a 1974 edition, when I was young, and it is a wonderful book.

    RoMadSan RodMadSanRoMadSan RodMadSan2 päivää sitten
  • With style

    Dab-a-tronDab-a-tron2 päivää sitten
  • Not thrusting...

    Zander LaMarcheZander LaMarche2 päivää sitten
  • Great presentation of the topic at hand again, but there where a few operational VTOL planes in the 1960 like the german EWR VJ 101 and Dornier Do 31, so not that surprised to see one on the lander program here.

    Fabian HerrmannFabian Herrmann2 päivää sitten
  • The apollo real time thing is really cool.

    jirikivaarijirikivaari2 päivää sitten
  • Another reason why people suspect it is fake is because in 1960s, there were no integrated circuits. All computation was using vacuum tubes. There is no way that they could fit that many vacuum tubes into that small module to achieve the REAL TIME SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR LIVE BROADCASTING. Once you realize it is physically impossible with 1960s technologies, you will realize the truth. Hard science won't lie.

    Jin KuangJin Kuang2 päivää sitten
    • @Jin Kuang Noise filtering would have been done at the ground stations. You know, the facilities with godzilla-sized satellite dishes.

      AtlasAtlasPäivä sitten
    • @Kyle Laurent I know what I am talking about. This is just a small set of technical issues that are impossible to address in 1960s technologies.

      Jin KuangJin KuangPäivä sitten
    • @Atlas You have no idea what you are talking about. Noise filtering is a main operation for real time signal processing. Back in the 1960s there is a big room in TV station doing it. In fact, not until 80s do we start having broadcasting vehicles small enough to fit into a van. And that is 1980s. Think about what is in 1960s when you need to fit a life supporting system AND a broadcasting system into that landing module.

      Jin KuangJin KuangPäivä sitten
    • You have no idea what you are talking about.

      Kyle LaurentKyle LaurentPäivä sitten
    • Of course there were integrated circuits back then, lol. And they didn't need to do any digital processing. It's just live TV. Live TV has been a thing since the early 1900.

      AtlasAtlasPäivä sitten
  • Landing is relatively easy. Launching the heavy life support module back up to 300 miles orbit is hard, even with 1/6 gravity. That is the real reason why people suspect the US landing and returning are fake. If you have a chance to look at the return rocket combustion video, you will conclude it was a joke.

    Jin KuangJin Kuang2 päivää sitten
    • @Jin Kuang Just do the calculations yourself, if you really care that much. Blueprints are freely available to the public. I have no idea what you mean by 'technology data'.

      AtlasAtlas18 tuntia sitten
    • Do you know why so much evidence were destroyed due to "negligence"? These evidence should be the most valuable technology data and blue prints for humanity. But no ... they were accidentally destroyed. Now we can not go back to the moon! Fundamental contradiction on how technology progress. How US suddenly get to land on the moon on the first try (very disruptive in technology progressing) and how suddenly it simply disappear (very disruptive in technology progressing).

      Jin KuangJin Kuang18 tuntia sitten
    • @Atlas I have not seen one single video or documentation on the combustion fuel needed to propel this ascending module (life supporting) back to 300 miles high up in orbit. The only video I saw was that laughable shot from the "moon surface" video on the combustion capture.

      Jin KuangJin Kuang18 tuntia sitten
    • @Jin Kuang Rocket science doesn't work like that.

      AtlasAtlas20 tuntia sitten
    • @Atlas So it is an equivalent of 1 ton weight on earth. Shoot that up 300 miles and how much combustion material is needed?

      Jin KuangJin Kuang20 tuntia sitten
  • 5:55 exactly, reason why america has area 51

    Antonín HájekAntonín Hájek2 päivää sitten
  • The yielding yacht expectantly guarantee because notebook electrophoretically borrow opposite a decorous creature. scared, damp jumbo

    Annie LogwoodAnnie Logwood2 päivää sitten
  • God tier science yt channel

    Andrew BickerdikeAndrew Bickerdike2 päivää sitten
  • 1:45 Among us 😳😳😳 nasa=among us???!!!111 among us = space game and space = nasa🚨🚨🚨😳😳😳

    AlwayslgAlwayslg2 päivää sitten
  • I still love the space program with all my heart and this video just made me happy. Thanks Destin, for the feels, and the history lesson.

    Doug WilsonDoug Wilson3 päivää sitten
  • Is this useful in kerbal space program?

    Auaer AuraerAuaer Auraer3 päivää sitten
  • This video was amazing. I hate driving a U-Haul in my hometown because I'm not familiar with how it handles--I never thought that the very first man to go to the moon had to confront the most extreme version of that feeling.

    CultureStressCultureStress3 päivää sitten
  • 1:45 😮

    Ethan BacarellaEthan Bacarella3 päivää sitten
  • 1:45 😳😳

    Shallow SportsmenShallow Sportsmen3 päivää sitten
  • Beautiful

    Paul AndersonPaul Anderson3 päivää sitten
  • Ottinger "I take some responsibility for not imagining that he could have been so dumb" first of all, lol, and second of all, I've had many of those moments in my career. I don't say that to make myself feel superior to anyone else but anticipating things that might go wrong, especially when it involves other people, is a serious challenge.

    Jon MooreJon Moore3 päivää sitten
  • The hurt badge pivotally concentrate because monkey temporarily invent given a mysterious kiss. black-and-white, brave insulation

    Mora MulfordMora Mulford3 päivää sitten
  • How to land on the moon? The same way you land on cheddar. Boo-yah!

    Peter PikePeter Pike3 päivää sitten
  • Have you made a video about Vortex Ring State vs “Settling With Power” in helicopters and the seeming controversy about the two terms between the US definitions and international definitions? The helicopter that crashed during the Bin Laden raid sent me down that rabbit hole. It’s interesting and difficult to find specifics. Would be interesting I think.

    Skywalker SoundSkywalker Sound3 päivää sitten
  • Michel Collins was the loneliest man in the universe when orbiting the moon by him self. He described it as very serene and calming.

    LiqtorLiqtor3 päivää sitten
  • 1:58 AMOGUS REFERENCE WHEN THE SMARTER EVERY DAY IS SUS 😳😳😳

    Joe BidomeJoe Bidome3 päivää sitten
    • @Jeremy Hopkins no u

      Joe BidomeJoe BidomePäivä sitten
    • 1:45

      Jeremy HopkinsJeremy HopkinsPäivä sitten
    • RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

      QuinnQuinn3 päivää sitten
  • Carrying the Fire is the best-written book from the Apollo era, Collins is a superb author.

    soopahsoopahsoopahsoopah3 päivää sitten
  • they did it in hollywood studios...EZ

    P5MasterP5Master3 päivää sitten
    • Did you even *watch* the video, moron?

      Brad WooldidgeBrad WooldidgePäivä sitten
  • The dusty goldfish canonically need because seed currently own near a vast mountain. woebegone, aback distance

    Juan HernandezJuan Hernandez3 päivää sitten
  • Seems like they could have solved their simulation problem by installing 4 smaller jets at each corner and throttle their lift to that of 5/6 the weight of the aircraft. Once they have done that, they could install the 5th main jet to move the 1/6 remaining weight and effectively have exactly what they would need on the moon. Then when they built the lunar landing craft they could do the exact same operation only to a 1/6 weight scale on the trust. Seems a lot simpler than building some giant platform crane that can in no way provide a consistent lift or 90° pull and will in no way be duplicatable on the moon.

    SavedBy GraceSavedBy Grace3 päivää sitten
  • My brain freezed every time you said Among Us...

    SimetjeSimetje3 päivää sitten
  • According to Don Pettit, we've lost the technology to go back to the moon. Maybe bc it was a Hollywood soundstage.

    Vincent VaderVincent Vader3 päivää sitten
    • We didn’t actually “lose the technology”, lol. We lost the infrastructure. Since you’re a flattard, look up what that word means.

      Brad WooldidgeBrad WooldidgePäivä sitten
    • We literally did though

      AtlasAtlasPäivä sitten
    • 'According to Don Pettit, we've lost the technology to go back to the moon'. According to an idiot that means all the Apollo missions were a gigantic hoax....

      ApocalipsApocalips3 päivää sitten
  • okay so i dont get it if we had to simulate the moon's gravity why not try the free fall thing, just in a very controlled environment where to simulate the moon's gravity?

    ronakbronakb3 päivää sitten
  • Mr. Wayne Ottiger I love that guy. I hope more people interviewed him, keep him company and leech off from his wonderful mind.

    yogi Halimyogi Halim3 päivää sitten
  • Hold up are we being pulled down to the earth or is the earth pushing up against us? Honestly you should do a video on gravity, there are couple contradicting theories

    evilsanta8585evilsanta85853 päivää sitten
  • Great we’re going back to the moon hopefully start making a lunar base, but it’s cool to think nowadays there are literally hundreds of space simulators, what would take a couple months of calculating some numbers would take mins now

    Michael StoylesMichael Stoyles3 päivää sitten
  • are these now rendered obsolete by accelerometer and gyroscope like in a quadcopter drone?

    yogi Halimyogi Halim3 päivää sitten
  • 2nd question, as an alternative to the frame built by nasa for testing 1/6th of the weight, can we use hot air baloon instead?

    yogi Halimyogi Halim3 päivää sitten
  • Can't you just remove weights, change into lighter frame etc like in automobile drag race, to offset the 1/6th weight in testing?

    yogi Halimyogi Halim3 päivää sitten
  • Is the new lunar landing not gonna be made by a computer? Like they did with the Mars Rover now. Would that not be way safer?

    1nf3ct3dTT1nf3ct3dTT3 päivää sitten
  • These guys are smart.

    Real HIFI HelpReal HIFI Help3 päivää sitten
  • Sus at 1:44

    p Hp H4 päivää sitten
  • Love this man

    Connor MichalecConnor Michalec4 päivää sitten
  • 1:58 sus!

    JACOB NEALJACOB NEAL4 päivää sitten
  • 1:58 is sus

    Matt MatyasMatt Matyas4 päivää sitten
  • All you need to do to manually land on the moon is play video games every day for 2 hours a day for all of your astronaut training, doing that will allow you to have almost instant reflexes and will be able to click at 15 cps

    that gamer that no one knows Brothat gamer that no one knows Bro4 päivää sitten
  • @19:43 conventional wisdom states that the phone in my pocket has more computational power than NASA had, in its entirety when Neil Armstrong made that step.... i have reviewed the schematics, and the code, and I am going to go with it.... so now let us consider what scientists and engineers accomplished with slide rules and transistors.... Now let Us push our tools so hard, to accomplish even more....

    Michael McKinleyMichael McKinley4 päivää sitten
  • Your interview with Mr. Ottinger is a national treasure... i was weeping nerd tears, when Mr. Ottinger said that engineers of his day were not better than the engineers of today... we use the tools we have, we stand on the shoulders of giants. Amen.

    Michael McKinleyMichael McKinley4 päivää sitten
  • @17:00 porting the compressor to bleed off for anti torque. that, friends and neighbors, is how you get to the moon... I believe we men walked on the moon. but the landing was always a rough spot for me. i downloaded something like 30 gigs of Apollo data from the NASA technical report server. it was all rational... but the landing part was really sketchy.... until now...

    Michael McKinleyMichael McKinley4 päivää sitten
  • Microsoft moon simulator

    C AC A4 päivää sitten
  • @8:02 what a delight to see Mr. Armstrong talking shop, after all these years.... NASA used a similar hoist mechanism, inside a vacuum chamber, to develop the ingenuity mars helicopter....

    Michael McKinleyMichael McKinley4 päivää sitten
  • 1:45 among us 1:59 among us again

    Yousif pro TVYousif pro TV4 päivää sitten
  • They don't need an LLTV trainer to return to the moon. The landing will be automated, like spaceX. Or if it was manual, the trainer would be entirely computer-simulator based

    aviatortrevoraviatortrevor4 päivää sitten
  • Neil Armstrong was a gift to the world who left us all too soon.

    Thomas OttThomas Ott4 päivää sitten
FIworld